208
Linescore N = 208 past 30 days fast food users
Preference Segments by Linescore
Regional Hot Dogs 2 | 208 | 37% | 14% | 14% | 36% |
Akron is Between 1 | 208 | 25% | 12% | 15% | 49% |
Pile-On | 208 | 20% | 9% | 10% | 61% |
Superscripts show the number of items over which an item has a significantly larger Acceptor Percentage (≥ .90 2-tail). |
1A. T-test showing statistical significance of percentage differences (probability of concept pairs is significant for P ≥ 0.90 acceptance, P ≤ 0.10 rejection, 2-tail)concept pair | Acceptor probability | Rejector probability |
Regional Hot Dogs vs. Akron is Between | 37 v 25 = 1 | 36 v 49 = 0 |
Regional Hot Dogs vs. Pile-On | 37 v 20 = 1 | 36 v 61 = 0 |
Akron is Between vs. Pile-On | 25 v 20 = 0.94 | 49 v 61 = 0 |
Standard competitive framework - Total Sample
Standard competitive framework
Most Frequent QSR for burgers, hot dogs, sandwiches | 208 | 32 | 31 | 30 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
Next Most Frequent QSR for burgers, hot dogs, sandwiches | 208 | 28 | 39 | 26 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
Regional Hot Dogs | 208 | 24 | 39 | 27 | 6 | 3 | 0 |
Akron is Between | 208 | 18 | 35 | 30 | 12 | 4 | 0 |
Pile-On | 208 | 16 | 22 | 25 | 24 | 11 | 3 |
Diagnostics
Please rate Akron is Between for having a unique message |
| Excellent | Very Good | Good | Fair | Poor | Terrible | |
|
|
Additional metrics linescale rating distribution - Having a unique message - Akron is Between
Excellent | 42 | 20 | 57 |
Very Good | 64 | 31 | 39 |
Good | 67 | 32 | 4 |
Fair | 27 | 13 | 0 |
Poor | 6 | 3 | 0 |
Terrible | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Please rate Pile-On for having a unique message |
| Excellent | Very Good | Good | Fair | Poor | Terrible | |
|
|
Additional metrics linescale rating distribution - Having a unique message - Pile-On
Excellent | 39 | 19 | 57 |
Very Good | 62 | 30 | 33 |
Good | 53 | 25 | 10 |
Fair | 34 | 16 | 0 |
Poor | 15 | 7 | 0 |
Terrible | 5 | 2 | 0 |
Please rate Regional Hot Dogs for having a unique message |
| Excellent | Very Good | Good | Fair | Poor | Terrible | |
|
|
Additional metrics linescale rating distribution - Having a unique message - Regional Hot Dogs
Excellent | 49 | 24 | 45 |
Very Good | 71 | 34 | 43 |
Good | 65 | 31 | 12 |
Fair | 17 | 8 | 0 |
Poor | 4 | 2 | 0 |
Terrible | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Please rate Akron is Between for likelihood you would purchase the item advertised |
| Excellent | Very Good | Good | Fair | Poor | Terrible | |
|
|
Additional metrics linescale rating distribution - Likelihood you would purchase - Akron is Between
Excellent | 41 | 20 | 51 |
Very Good | 55 | 26 | 45 |
Good | 59 | 28 | 4 |
Fair | 33 | 16 | 0 |
Poor | 11 | 5 | 0 |
Terrible | 9 | 4 | 0 |
Please rate Pile-On for likelihood you would purchase the item advertised |
| Excellent | Very Good | Good | Fair | Poor | Terrible | |
|
|
Additional metrics linescale rating distribution - Likelihood you would purchase - Pile-On
Excellent | 29 | 14 | 43 |
Very Good | 45 | 22 | 45 |
Good | 35 | 17 | 12 |
Fair | 49 | 24 | 0 |
Poor | 36 | 17 | 0 |
Terrible | 14 | 7 | 0 |
Please rate Regional Hot Dogs for likelihood you would purchase the item advertised |
| Excellent | Very Good | Good | Fair | Poor | Terrible | |
|
|
Additional metrics linescale rating distribution - Likelihood you would purchase - Regional Hot Dogs
Excellent | 45 | 22 | 43 |
Very Good | 77 | 37 | 54 |
Good | 47 | 23 | 3 |
Fair | 21 | 10 | 0 |
Poor | 11 | 5 | 0 |
Terrible | 7 | 3 | 0 |
Would you tell your family and friends about Akron is Between? |
| Yes, I absolutely would tell them about it | Maybe I would tell them about it. | No way. I would not recommend this. | |
|
|
Additional metrics linescale rating distribution - Recommend to family/friends - Akron is Between
Yes, I absolutely would tell them about it | 76 | 37 | 82 |
Maybe I would tell them about it. | 115 | 55 | 18 |
No way. I would not recommend this. | 17 | 8 | 0 |
Would you tell your family and friends about Pile-On? |
| Yes, I absolutely would tell them about it | Maybe I would tell them about it. | No way. I would not recommend this. | |
|
|
Additional metrics linescale rating distribution - Recommend to family/friends - Pile-On
Yes, I absolutely would tell them about it | 73 | 35 | 79 |
Maybe I would tell them about it. | 95 | 46 | 21 |
No way. I would not recommend this. | 40 | 19 | 0 |
Would you tell your family and friends about Regional Hot Dogs? |
| Yes, I absolutely would tell them about it | Maybe I would tell them about it. | No way. I would not recommend this. | |
|
|
Additional metrics linescale rating distribution - Recommend to family/friends - Regional Hot Dogs
Yes, I absolutely would tell them about it | 100 | 48 | 82 |
Maybe I would tell them about it. | 96 | 46 | 18 |
No way. I would not recommend this. | 12 | 6 | 0 |
Competitive Benchmarks
Average ratings - Total sample
Standard competitive framework - Total Sample
Standard competitive framework
Most Frequent QSR for burgers, hot dogs, sandwiches | 208 | 32 | 31 | 30 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
Next Most Frequent QSR for burgers, hot dogs, sandwiches | 208 | 28 | 39 | 26 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
Regional Hot Dogs | 208 | 24 | 39 | 27 | 6 | 3 | 0 |
Akron is Between | 208 | 18 | 35 | 30 | 12 | 4 | 0 |
Pile-On | 208 | 16 | 22 | 25 | 24 | 11 | 3 |
Competitive Favorite - Acceptors of within Share of Sample
Combined bar lengths represents share of answer to question "
Which of these do you most frequently go to for hamburgers, hot dogs or other types of sandwiches? (Please select or write in just one)"
Blue portion is the percentage of Acceptors of within each bar.
Competitive Favorite
All Competitors | 100 | 37 | 25 | 42 |
McDonald's | 36 | 38 | 22 | 18 |
Wendy's | 13 | 30 | 19 | 7 |
Burger King | 12 | 52 | 32 | 5 |
Subway | 8 | 38 | 31 | 1 |
Other | 8 | 31 | 25 | 2 |
Chik-Fil-A | 3 | 14 | 0 | 1 |
Jack in the Box | 3 | 67 | 33 | 1 |
Local Deli or sandwich shop | 2 | 20 | 20 | 1 |
In and Out Burger | 2 | 20 | 40 | 0 |
Dairy Queen | 2 | 40 | 40 | 0 |
Quiznos | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Taco Bell | 2 | 0 | 25 | 2 |
Carl's Jr. | 2 | 25 | 25 | 1 |
Arby's | 2 | 50 | 50 | 0 |
KFC | 0 | 100 | 0 | 2 |
Popeye's Chicken & Biscuits | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Jimmy John's | 0 | 100 | 100 | 0 |
Hardee's | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
White Castle | 0 | 100 | 100 | 1 |
Taco Bueno | 0 | n/a | n/a | n/a |
Big Boy's | 0 | n/a | n/a | n/a |
Church's Chicken | 0 | n/a | n/a | n/a |
Whataburger | 0 | n/a | n/a | n/a |
Pizza Hut | 0 | n/a | n/a | n/a |
N=16 Other
Checkers, cook myself , DOMINICKS FRANKS, Maryland Chicken, Mighty Taco, sonics, speedway , steak n shake |
culvers | 3 |
Sonic | 5 |
WHY - DRIVER ANALYSIS
All Reasons for Rating table shows how often each reason
was selected as a main reason for rating by Total Sample and each of the
four Acceptance Segments. (Clicking on a segment column header twice will
rank order the reasons for that segment.)
Regional Hot Dogs
All Reasons for Rating in Total and by Linescore
(+) The food sounded good | 79 | 38 | 50 | 52 | 45 | 18 |
(+) The food looked good | 129 | 62 | 79 | 72 | 66 | 40 |
(+) Upbeat | 54 | 26 | 26 | 34 | 31 | 21 |
(+) Happy | 41 | 20 | 26 | 14 | 17 | 16 |
(+) Funny | 41 | 20 | 25 | 17 | 31 | 11 |
(+) Engaging | 33 | 16 | 24 | 14 | 17 | 8 |
(+) Is for someone like me | 41 | 20 | 36 | 14 | 14 | 8 |
(+) Characters sound like friends of mine | 12 | 6 | 11 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
(+) Distinctive foods | 49 | 24 | 30 | 31 | 24 | 14 |
(+) Variety of toppings | 115 | 56 | 74 | 55 | 41 | 42 |
(+) Entertaining | 59 | 29 | 32 | 34 | 14 | 29 |
(+) Learned something interesting | 30 | 14 | 18 | 14 | 24 | 7 |
(+) Makes me hungry | 88 | 43 | 61 | 31 | 52 | 25 |
(+) Sonic has high-quality ingredients compared to other fast food restaurants | 42 | 20 | 30 | 21 | 10 | 14 |
(-) The food description did not sound good to me | 11 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 14 |
(-) The food did not look good/appeal to me | 12 | 6 | 0 | 7 | 7 | 11 |
(-) Didn't tell me enough about the food | 15 | 7 | 4 | 10 | 7 | 10 |
(-) Not my kind of ad | 13 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 15 |
(-) Do not believe ingredients are high quality compared to other fast food restaurants | 7 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 7 |
(-) Voices are irritating | 15 | 7 | 4 | 7 | 3 | 12 |
(-) I like my hot dogs plain | 14 | 7 | 1 | 10 | 7 | 11 |
(-) Not believable | 7 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
(-) Not funny | 16 | 8 | 3 | 7 | 7 | 14 |
(-) Not engaging | 13 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 12 |
(-) Not entertaining | 13 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 15 |
(-) Boring | 7 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 8 |
(-) Confusing | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
(-) Not a good value | 10 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 7 |
Driver Analysis bar charts show the discriminant
importance of each reason as a driver of Acceptance.
The length of the bars is determined by two factors – (1)
how many people selected a reason, and (2) the difference between Acceptors
and Rejectors or between Acceptors and Borderline.
Reasons with stars are statistically significant differences
at the 90% confidence level. Note that significance is often greater for
reasons that have fewer total selections, but important differences.
Acceptors vs. Rejectors
Borderline vs. Acceptors
Akron is Between
All Reasons for Rating in Total and by Linescore
(+) The food sounded good | 76 | 37 | 51 | 48 | 52 | 22 |
(+) The food looked good | 119 | 57 | 76 | 60 | 74 | 42 |
(+) Upbeat | 49 | 24 | 31 | 16 | 35 | 18 |
(+) Happy | 33 | 16 | 29 | 4 | 13 | 13 |
(+) Funny | 24 | 12 | 14 | 16 | 6 | 11 |
(+) Engaging | 36 | 17 | 29 | 20 | 16 | 11 |
(+) Is for someone like me | 34 | 16 | 35 | 24 | 6 | 8 |
(+) Characters sound like friends of mine | 4 | 2 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
(+) Distinctive foods | 64 | 31 | 55 | 40 | 26 | 18 |
(+) Variety of toppings | 99 | 48 | 71 | 60 | 52 | 32 |
(+) Entertaining | 39 | 19 | 25 | 28 | 16 | 14 |
(+) Learned something interesting | 26 | 12 | 24 | 16 | 3 | 9 |
(+) Makes me hungry | 71 | 34 | 59 | 36 | 32 | 22 |
(+) Sonic has high-quality ingredients compared to other fast food restaurants | 43 | 21 | 37 | 12 | 19 | 15 |
(-) The food description did not sound good to me | 20 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 18 |
(-) The food did not look good/appeal to me | 18 | 9 | 0 | 8 | 3 | 15 |
(-) Didn't tell me enough about the food | 17 | 8 | 2 | 8 | 6 | 12 |
(-) Not my kind of ad | 22 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 19 |
(-) Do not believe ingredients are high quality compared to other fast food restaurants | 9 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 7 |
(-) Voices are irritating | 9 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 6 |
(-) I like my hot dogs plain | 22 | 11 | 2 | 16 | 10 | 14 |
(-) Not believable | 7 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 6 |
(-) Not funny | 21 | 10 | 8 | 0 | 3 | 16 |
(-) Not engaging | 23 | 11 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 20 |
(-) Not entertaining | 24 | 12 | 0 | 4 | 13 | 19 |
(-) Boring | 11 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 9 |
(-) Confusing | 11 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 10 |
(-) Not a good value | 9 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 7 |
Driver Analysis bar charts show the discriminant
importance of each reason as a driver of Acceptance.
The length of the bars is determined by two factors – (1)
how many people selected a reason, and (2) the difference between Acceptors
and Rejectors or between Acceptors and Borderline.
Reasons with stars are statistically significant differences
at the 90% confidence level. Note that significance is often greater for
reasons that have fewer total selections, but important differences.
Acceptors vs. Rejectors
Borderline vs. Acceptors
Pile-On
All Reasons for Rating in Total and by Linescore
(+) The food sounded good | 47 | 23 | 45 | 26 | 43 | 11 |
(+) The food looked good | 58 | 28 | 52 | 42 | 48 | 14 |
(+) Upbeat | 49 | 24 | 48 | 37 | 24 | 13 |
(+) Happy | 23 | 11 | 26 | 5 | 10 | 7 |
(+) Funny | 62 | 30 | 60 | 42 | 19 | 20 |
(+) Engaging | 35 | 17 | 21 | 32 | 24 | 12 |
(+) Is for someone like me | 19 | 9 | 26 | 16 | 10 | 2 |
(+) Characters sound like friends of mine | 9 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 5 | 2 |
(+) Distinctive foods | 21 | 10 | 12 | 11 | 19 | 8 |
(+) Variety of toppings | 70 | 34 | 57 | 47 | 43 | 22 |
(+) Entertaining | 78 | 38 | 62 | 47 | 33 | 29 |
(+) Learned something interesting | 12 | 6 | 7 | 16 | 10 | 3 |
(+) Makes me hungry | 40 | 19 | 38 | 53 | 38 | 5 |
(+) Sonic has high-quality ingredients compared to other fast food restaurants | 33 | 16 | 24 | 37 | 24 | 9 |
(-) The food description did not sound good to me | 26 | 12 | 2 | 11 | 5 | 17 |
(-) The food did not look good/appeal to me | 24 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 17 |
(-) Didn't tell me enough about the food | 39 | 19 | 5 | 21 | 5 | 25 |
(-) Not my kind of ad | 54 | 26 | 0 | 11 | 19 | 38 |
(-) Do not believe ingredients are high quality compared to other fast food restaurants | 5 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 3 |
(-) Voices are irritating | 8 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 6 |
(-) I like my hot dogs plain | 13 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 9 |
(-) Not believable | 20 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 15 |
(-) Not funny | 30 | 14 | 0 | 11 | 5 | 21 |
(-) Not engaging | 23 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18 |
(-) Not entertaining | 27 | 13 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 21 |
(-) Boring | 19 | 9 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 13 |
(-) Confusing | 22 | 11 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 15 |
(-) Not a good value | 24 | 12 | 7 | 0 | 5 | 16 |
Driver Analysis bar charts show the discriminant
importance of each reason as a driver of Acceptance.
The length of the bars is determined by two factors – (1)
how many people selected a reason, and (2) the difference between Acceptors
and Rejectors or between Acceptors and Borderline.
Reasons with stars are statistically significant differences
at the 90% confidence level. Note that significance is often greater for
reasons that have fewer total selections, but important differences.
Acceptors vs. Rejectors
Borderline vs. Acceptors